Dozens of heavily guarded extremist Israeli settlers break into al-Aqsa Mosque
Occupied Palestine (QNN) - Dozens of heavily guarded extremist Israeli settlers on Thursday broke into the courtyards of the al-Aqsa Mosque.
According to the Jerusalem Islamic Waqf department, over 200 extremist Israeli settlers broke into the al-Aqsa Mosque via the Maghariba gate and conducted provocative tours in its courtyards.
The department added that the settlers received explanations on the alleged ‘Temple Mount’ and performed Talmudic rituals in several parts of the mosque, particularly in the eastern area.
It indicated that the Israeli occupation authorities imposed tight restrictions on Palestinian worshippers seeking to access the Al-Aqsa Mosque and seize their IDs at its gates.
In the same context, worshipers, educational students, and guards of the al-Aqsa mosque who were present there defended it by chants and Takbeer (saying Allah Akbar), and hampered the settlers from roaming it freely.
It’s noteworthy that the al-Aqsa mosque Compound exposes on a daily basis to the storming of the Israeli settlers, at which they perform Talmudic rituals and discrete its sanctity.
‘Israel’ seeks through its storming to the al-Aqsa to devout the temporal and spatial division of the mosque and to Judaize the occupied Palestinian city of Jerusalem.
In a statement signed by Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, the Assembly of Catholic Ordinaries of the Holy Land condemned the desecration of an image of Jesus Christ by an Israeli soldier, warning that Israeli attacks on Christian symbols are not isolated incidents.
Hungary’s incoming prime minister Péter Magyar has disputed claims that Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu was formally invited to Budapest, saying he would face detention if he enters Hungary under an active warrant from the International Criminal Court.
US President Donald Trump says Israel did not push him into war with Iran, yet he cites the October 7 military operation on Israel as his main justification, an argument that exposes a clear contradiction at the heart of his decision.